Bobcat Goldthwait may still be best known as "that crazy comic" from the 1980s, but he has carved out a pretty decent new career as a director over the past few years. Last night (April 29, 2013) I was lucky enough to be in attendance at the world premiere of his latest film, "Willow Creek" (2013). It was showing at the Somerville Theatre in Somerville, MA. The screening was part of the 2013 Independent Film Festival of Boston. While getting chance to see a film's world premiere is reason enough to get excited, what made this night extremely interesting for me was that "Willow Creek" just happens to be a horror movie about...Bigfoot! It was a good night and a very good movie. Bobcat Goldthwait himself introduced the movie before it started, and then did a Q&A session with the stars of the film after it ended.
Here's the podcast from The Bigfoot Report:
Over the past decade or so there has been a huge explosion of new Bigfoot and Abominable Snowman movies. With the popularity of the show "Finding Bigfoot" this trend will probably continue. When I first started noticing that new Bigfoot movies were appearing I was excited to see the genre return to the big (and small) screen. But when I sat down and watched these movies I realized that they were almost exclusively simply trashy horror/slasher movies that just happened to feature (a generally crappy-looking) Bigfoot as the murderous "monster" doing all the gruesome killing. To make things worse, it was obvious that the accessibility of computers and cheap, easily made CGI effects made most of these creatures possible. A terrible gorilla suit is bad enough, but really crappy CGI Bigfoot monsters and gore effects make for practically unwatchable crap. This will all tie in with the review of the movie, trust me.
Back to "Willow Creek". The most important things I learned from the podcast were that Bobcat was an actual fan (if that's the right word) of Bigfoot, and that this movie wasn't meant to be "snarky" about Bigfoot or the people who believe in the creature. Not really knowing much more about the movie, I was excited to see it. I guess the only other important thing to know is that this is a "Found Footage" movie (a la "The Blair Witch Project" (1999) and "Cloverfield" (2008). I know a lot of people are tired of this format and automatically hate anything done in the style without even having to watch it. While I agree that the unexpected popularity of "Blair Witch" was responsible for the gimmick being overused, I still think it's possible to do good things with it.
When we got to the Somerville Theatre about an hour before the 9:30 showtime there were already a handful of people lining up to get in. Apparently they wanted to get the best seats and were willing to wait an hour to do so. We went for a drink and returned around 9:20 to see very long line snaking around to the back of the theater building.
It was nice to see such a large and enthusiastic turnout for a Bigfoot movie--even if 95% of the people were actually there mainly to see Bobcat Goldthwait. We got our seats and enjoyed an introduction to the movie from Bobcat himself. He had recently had spinal surgery and was all hopped up on painkillers, so it was impressive that he made the effort to be there at all in the first place. He managed to be funny and talk coherently about the movie and why he made it.
But what about the movie itself?
"Willow Creek" tells the story--through found film footage--of Jim and Kelly, a couple who are trying to make a documentary about Bigfoot by traveling to the Pacific Northwest, visiting some of the tourist traps of Bigfoot Country and camping out at the site of the most famous Bigfoot sighting of all-time, Bluff Creek. This was where, in 1967, Roger Patterson and Bob Gimlin took the famous footage of a large bipedal creature walking off into the woods that yielded the most well-known image of Bigfoot ever taken--an iconic image familiar with both Bigfoot enthusiasts and people who don't even know anything about the subject.
 |
| Still from the 1967 Patterson-Gimlin film |
When they finally do take off for the film site we get an idea of just how remote the area is. Paved roads lead to dirt roads of increasingly poor quality. This is where they meet a creepy hillbilly who gives them a very clear and direct threat that they should turn back. Of course they don't listen. They finally have to hike in the last few miles when the road eventually ends altogether. As it gets close to nightfall they decide to make camp before finishing the journey in the morning. This is where the main action of the film happens. They wander away from their tent to check out the scenery (and take a dip in a stream) and return to find the campsite trashed. Trashed by what or whom we don't know. Was it a bear? Was it the hillbillies messing with them? Was it Bigfoot?
The next scenes are in and around the tent at night. After an awkward marriage proposal from Bob we see the couple wakened from sleep by strange sounds in the woods. This is the part of a movie that provides the greatest challenge for a "Found Footage" film. Suspense and mood need to be established and maintained without using many cuts and/or edits in the film. It's also necessary to make it believable that the characters would be filming what we're seeing. I thought Bobcat did a fine job on all fronts during this stretch. The centerpiece is an approximately nineteen-minute shot of Jim and Kelly in the tent listening to the sounds around them and becoming increasingly creeped out as they try to figure out what they are hearing. The camera is on a tripod (or something that keeps it steady) and doesn't move during this whole scene. At first Jim hears "knocking", which is an actual method of knocking pieces of wood together that is supposedly used by Bigfoot creatures to communicate in some way. The sounds are coming from far off and aren't frequent. It could certainly just be natural sounds of the forest--as Kelly tries to convince herself. Later they start hearing strange whooping sounds that Jim refers to as "vocalization", another noted Bigfoot communication method. The yelps don't sound particularly threatening, but are unnerving. And the noises seem to be moving around the campsite and getting closer. Next come deeper moaning sounds that are much more creepy, and what sounds like a child or a woman crying. They start to hear something walking around the campsite, rocks are thrown at the tent, and finally something or someone pushes down on the tent before retreating when Kelly screams. Throughout this long scene Kelly is transformed from a skeptic into a true believer (even if she's most likely not sure exactly what it is that she now believes in). This whole scene is the centerpiece, and the most effective part, of the whole movie.
We next see the couple at dawn as they break camp and announce that they are abandoning the project, heading out of the woods and going home. But first they have to find their way back to their car. Along the way Jim finds and collects a hair sample and they get the feeling (with increasing certainty) they are being followed. Naturally they don't find their way back to the car. As nightfall nears they realize they had been spending hours walking in circles. The film closes out with the couple's ultimate journey into fear as they finally encounter what has been following them and messing with them since they entered the deep forest. Without giving away the ending I will say that we find out in a few quick and loud minutes just why the story is being told solely through some "found footage".
I thought "Willow Creek" was an excellent movie. At least excellent in terms of a Bigfoot film anyway. I grew up in the 1970s and saw movies like "Creature from Black Lake" (1976), "Sasquatch: The Legend of Bigfoot" (1977) and the documentary "The Mysterious Monsters" (1975). To this day these remain my favorite Bigfoot films of all time. They probably wouldn't be considered of very high quality today, but because of what they meant to me as a terrified kid they remain the best of the best. "Harry and the Hendersons" (1987) was a fine bigger-budget Hollywood film, and probably the "best" Bigfoot movie ever made, quality-wise, but I don't really think of it a true Bigfoot film so much as a nice family movie that just happens to be about Bigfoot. I have also seen most of the slew of newer Bigfoot horror movies I mentioned at the beginning of this piece, and pretty much dislike the vast majority of them. I think "Willow Creek" is (to me at least) one of the best Bigfoot movies ever made, and probably the best since the heyday of the 1970s. It gave me genuine chills during the inside-the-tent scenes, and I can honestly say that, for me, it was genuinely scary in places (something that most modern horror films can't say). To be honest, I was a bit disappointed with the ending. It had to have an ending, and this one certainly finished things up in a major (but still mysterious) way and let you know just what or who was responsible for the action outside the tent the night before. It even included a big surprise element that was foreshadowed earlier in the movie. It gets you thinking and wondering, but in the end it was just a touch too much for me. In fact, it felt almost like a shot-for-shot re-creation of the ending of "The Blair Witch Project", with Bigfoot inserted in place of a witch. I can't say exactly what was wrong with it, or how I'd recommend improving it, but it just felt a bit forced. Otherwise (and even with this issue) I really did think that it was a very good movie. It's certainly something that Bigfoot buffs should enjoy.
SPOILER ALERT
If you plan on watching the movie and want to be surprised going into it,
please don't read any further...
What might be the best thing about "Willow Creek" is the fact that it's pretty obvious that there is indeed a Bigfoot creature (many of them in fact), but we never see it onscreen. The worst part of most of the new wave of Bigfoot horror films is the onscreen appearances of the Bigfoot creatures themselves. Whether it's a guy in a suit or a CGI creature (and especially when it's a CGI creature) the monsters always seem to disappoint big time. Some of the filmmakers seem to put a decent amount of effort into the costumes, but the low-budget nature of the direct-to-video market limits what they can do. The easy alternative is to go the increasingly accessible CGI route. These monsters always end up being overblown and move too quickly and unrealistically to be believed. Bobcat saved the money of creating a creature and left that part to the imagination of the viewer. We all have a pretty good idea of what Bigfoot is supposed to look like and using our imaginations ends up being a much cheaper and more effective special effect. Bobcat did a great job of building the suspense, and by the time it all ends you don't really feel you need to actually see the thing that's doing all this stuff to feel satisfied.
As I mentioned, the ending was very derivative of "The Blair Witch Project". The whole movie was of a similar framework, but that's to be expected in a "Found Footage" movie. I wasn't bothered by the similarity until the end. The surprise element, mentioned above, concerns what can only be described as a "forest bride", who was alluded to earlier in the film while the couple were touring Bigfoot Country. It's adds a disturbing element to what was already a disturbing ending as our main characters meet their horrifying demise. Since this is a horror movie there's nothing wrong with it having a gruesome and disturbing ending (and the gore, like the creature, is never explicitly shown). I'm not even sure exactly why I was put off by the ending. Maybe Bobcat just did too good of a job making me like these people and I simply didn't want it to end the way I knew it had to end.
